Categories
Archives
Subscribe to Email Updates
More from SIG
SponsorPitch News
- AOL Covers New York's Fall Fashion Week -- Uptown, Downtown and on the WebAs fashion week kicks off in New York City this week, AOL will be bringing the runway to not only its online audience, but also New York City pedestrians. Through September 17th, an outdoor screen outside The Standard will show highlights from the previous day's MAC & Milk fashion shows. AOL will also sponsor the Media Lounge at Mercedes-Benz Fashio […]
Sports Business Daily News
- USSA Seeks Dir of Consumer Products MarketingIncrease your company's exposure in the sport business marketplace and get your message in front of the industry's top executives. For more information on placing a classified in SportsBusiness Daily, please contact Heather Taylor at 704-973-1525 or htaylor@sportsbusinessdaily.com. […]
Power Sponsorship Blog
- 11 Good Reasons to Exit a Sponsorship (and 5 Bad Ones)I was inspired by a great question I got today, and am writing a couple of blogs on exiting sponsorships. This one is about why you should and shouldn’t exit, the next one is about how to do it well. Good reasons to exit a sponsorship… It was never a good brand or target market fit. It was […]
Sponsorpark Blog
- Spotlight on Sponsorship! The Clearwater Film FestivalAs a way to draw increased awareness and attention to some of the standup sponsorship opportunities on our site, we have decided to set apart one blog per month to put the “Spotlight on Sponsorship”! If you have a premium level listing on SponsorPark, and would like to have your event featured, please contact Stephanie.Lochmiller@SponsorPark.com to submit yo […]
Seth’s Blog
- Interpreting criticismHeartfelt criticism of your idea or your art is usually right (except when it isn't...) Check out this letter from the publisher of a magazine you've never heard of to the founder of a little magazine called Readers Digest: But,... […]
Jason Peck’s Blog
- Sports and Social Media – Why Should Sponsors Care?Today is the last post in a series with thoughts from some pretty smart folks to try to answer the question of why people should care about the intersection of sports and social media. You can see […]
Tag Cloud
Activation
Add new tag
Advertising
advocacy
agency
campaign
collaboration
education
endorsements
Events
festivals
fulfillment
golf
IEG
ignorance
LinkedIn
Marketing
Miramar Events
music
news
olympics
partnership marketing
Politics
power sponsorship
predictions
president
propoganda
Public Relations
Pumpkins
recaps
reporting
representation
republicans
resources
Sales
service
sig
Social Media
sponsorship insights group
Sponsorships
Sports
sports marketing
Strategy
tiger
Training
Archive for September, 2008
Sep,2008
24
Visa recently unveiled their new tagline, “Life Takes Visa,” during the 2008 Summer Olympics. The timing demonstrated a well-coordinated marketing effort in which the advertising campaign and Visa’s sponsorship of the Olympics augmented each other and enhanced the overall effectiveness. The sponsorship agreement involves an exclusivity arrangement which establishes Visa as “the only card accepted at all Olympic Games venues for any official Olympic Games-related transactions.” (http://www.corporate.visa.com/md/fs/olympics/olympic_facts.jsp) There were 6.52 million tourist arrivals in Beijing during the Olympics and they soon found that, for the next 16 days and 17 nights, life only took Visa.
Let’s consider how this played out for Visa. The benefits that Visa sought from the sponsorship agreement most likely include heightened brand visibility, increased sales, and enhanced brand image.
- Brand visibility: Pre-Olympic promotional programs were implemented in conjunction with partnering financial institutions in 46 different countries. Visa definitely gained exposure during the actual two and a half week period, and the new Visa card accounts that were opened during this timeframe further extended the visibility factor post-Olympics.
- Increased sales: Visa not only increased its sales volume during the Games, it also had an opportunity to more effectively showcase products other than its credit cards. During the Torino Winter Olympics Visa issued 650,000 prepaid cards in direct relation to Olympic transactions, and similar results can be expected of the recent Summer Games.
- Enhanced brand image: This is where the value of exclusivity becomes ambiguous. Consumers tend to use credit cards for the convenience factor. Ironically, Visa created an inconvenient situation for anyone who did not already use a Visa credit card or would have preferred to use another card for whatever reason (corporate card, reward points, etc.). Furthermore, consumers have generally come to expect the freedom of paying for their purchases with their major credit card of choice so the Visa-only policy has resulted in many an unpleasant purchasing experience and has generated a certain degree of backlash. On the other hand, their exclusivity on such a prestigious event may have caused some purchasers to wish they had a Visa!
Brand visibility is fundamentally valuable when it translates into increased business, so the value of heightened brand visibility for Visa is diminished if negative consumer perceptions develop. Also, it is unclear whether higher sales figures resulted from an actual increase in consumer preference for Visa or if the increase in sales was primarily a one-time deal rather than a sustainable improvement.
Clearly, brand visibility, sales, and brand image are inextricably interdependent. While there are measurable short-term improvements, it remains uncertain whether the derived benefits are sustainable and worth the costs of implementing Visa’s Olympic marketing strategies. So the question Visa needs to ask itself is: Is the Halo effect from the Olympics worth the risk of turning off customers with the lack of alternative payment options?
